If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?

The rams may shock all the mock drafters and so called experts and take the weapon that so may seahawk fans have their sites set on in Crabtree. They have more of a need at that position then we do...with Holt being their # 1 guy and getting up there in age and no real depth, the pass happy rams may just pull the trigger on the best player in the draft.

That leaves us with the number 4 pick and a tough choice to make. OL,DL,CB,or RB I feel that these are really the only viable areas that would make sense, but you may have different ideas ...its a guessing game anyway.

I can start the shit storm by saying that OL is not an option, DL is possible but not my first choice .That leaves CB and RB. CB is without a doubt a weakness and I could live with Jenkins but paying him 4 money would suck ..thats unless he rips it up..and thats the issue...replacing a flop with a flop will piss me off....RB However is a safe bet....as part of a platoon its not like all our eggs are in one basket, and if he flops then we at least have options.

OL not an option? Dude you are obviously are suffering head trauma. I'm Done with you.

Trade down, try to recoup our losses from the Colbert experiment, and pick the best player left that's a WR, DB, or OT.

Michael Crabtree isn't really an unknown or anything for the Rams pick right now as you make it sound to be. I've acutally heard that the Rams organization, as of now, really loves Crabtree. Their is a lot still left in the draft process but from what I've heard, he seems to be tops on their board as of now. Donnie Avery is a nice #2 for them, but they lack a future #1 and Torry Holt is leaving sooner rather then later. If the stud WR is gone, then a potential Franchise LT like Eugene Monroe or Michael Oher (even Jason Smith) has gotta tempt Ruskell and the Seattle braintrust.

Ive got head trauma ???? We have like 12 OL and you want to spend our first pick on another one... :lol:

"I'm Done with you. " I want my ring back then ...Beoocth

This coming from the man that had Crabtree falling to 10 in his mock draft :lol: :lol: Looks like that was " Unknown " to you

The Rams are smarter than that they will fill the void at LT

I don't know, we are talking about the Rams :lol:

It's intersting though. When the Rams took Torry Holt, they were coming off a 4-12 season in 1998. They didn't have a Franchise QB (Kurt Warner was a 3rd stringer), added Marshall Faulk before the Draft, and had a solid group of receivers, but nobody had yet to establish themselves as a #1 (Issac Bruce didn't do much in '98, and they also had Proehl and Hakim). They draft Torry Holt in the Top 10, next year, they wim the Super Bowl. Holt was a pretty highly rated prospect. Not on the same level Crabtree currently is, but they were in a similar situation back then and went with the stud Receiver and look what happened. Now, I know it was a long time ago, but their has to be at least a few people left around from those Rams teams that will likely have the same input.

So in your eyes all OL are equal huh? That is why I think you are retarded. We have ONE good OL player, and he is old and uncertain.

I think I remember hearing that Crabtree isn't going to run in the combine. It can really only hurt his stock if he does.

My bad, big oversight there. I was under the impression Issac Bruce was drafted only a year or two before the Rams only checked the Rams stats in '98 and '99. Also, I never said he was "awful" in 1998. Like I said, I was under the impression it was only his first or second year, and that 38 receptions was pretty solid for a receiver that young.