Welcome to Seahawks Huddle NFL Football Forum!
Seahawks Huddle has one of the leading forums on the Internet to discussion our beloved Seattle Seahawks. Come by and join the conversion.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.
95% of ALL ads will be removed once you register for an account

Hawks trade 1st round pick to Minnesota

Discussion in 'Talkin' Hawks' started by Seahawk Freak, Jan 25, 2009.

Page 1 of 2

  1. Seahawk Freak Huddler

    Member Since:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Message Count:
    177
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    60
    The Vikes think they are a franchise QB away from the Super Bowl! So How is this for a trade. The Hawks give the Vikings the #4 and Seattle gets the 24 pick in the 1st round and there 2 and 3rd round picks.

    That would give us 5 picks in the first 3 rounds.
    Seahawk Freak, Jan 25, 2009
    #1
  2. Don't want to see these ads? Register for a FREE Account.

    Do you want to advertise on Seahawks Huddle? Click here for details.

  3. SeahawkWag

    Member Since:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Location:
    Everett WA
    that is not enough for the 4 pick if you are only getting the 24th you need 2 first rounders minimum. There would not be a top of line OT at 24 also.
    and why would we EVER want to help minnesota?
    SeahawkWag, Jan 25, 2009
    #2

  4. Cole Huddler

    Member Since:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Message Count:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Victoria, Texas
    FUCK MINNESOTA
    Cole, Jan 26, 2009
    #3

  5. JGleas Huddler

    Member Since:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would be an ideal situation but, it's very, very hard to trade out of the Top 10, let alone Top 5. A team has to give up a lot of draft picks and truly be in love with somebody. Not only that, they are going to have to spend a lot of money on that player. Stafford would expect Matt Ryan money if Minnesota pretty much traded the farm to move up for him, and Matt Ryan got paid as a Top 5 QB in the league as a rookie. Vikings would have to be very in love with Stafford (or Sanchez I guess) to give up that much in both draft picks and money because they would be investing A LOT.
    JGleas, Jan 26, 2009
    #4
    • Super Moderator

    Seattlehawk94 Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1986
    Member Since:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    250
    Location:
    Throne Room in my Death Star.
    That was a waste of a click..

    If you are going to do these kinda threads at least "Say: How's this for an idea or Draft Idea".

    I saw that thread and thought we did it.
    Seattlehawk94, Jan 26, 2009
    #5

  7. vanillathrilla

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Likewise. Goddamn teaser topic.
    vanillathrilla, Jan 26, 2009
    #6
    • Moderator

    Fenom Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1991
    Member Since:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Message Count:
    2,471
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I can see us moving down a max of 10 picks, but all the way down to 24 with a 2nd and 3rd round pick isn't going to do anything for us. Maybe trade down like 4 or 5 picks and pick up a 2nd Round pick as well.
    Fenom, Jan 26, 2009
    #7

  9. vanillathrilla

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    vanillathrilla, Jan 26, 2009
    #8
    • Moderator

    Pottsie Moderator

    Member Since:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Message Count:
    565
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    Florence, AL
    Mark my words...WILL NOT HAPPEN.
    Pottsie, Jan 27, 2009
    #9
    • Super Moderator

    bobflipaburger Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1989
    Member Since:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    4,210
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Roy ,WA
    Yeah, looking at that chart they'd have to throw a shit load of picks our way like swapping 1sts, and giving us their 2nd and a 1st and a 2nd next year... I would swap firsts with them if they threw in hutch :D lol.
    bobflipaburger, Jan 27, 2009
    #10

  12. Idahawk Huddler

    Member Since:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    A motel with your wife
    Well, rumor is we are wanting TJ Howsyourmomma meaning that the Crabtree pick may not be an option for us at 2...I personally believe the Rams may take Crabtree to help with an aging Holt and the Loss of Bruce last season....That IMO would leave us the option to trade down a few spots and take the best running back available...in Moreno or Wells or MCcoy....or Maybe DT Raji. ...We have no track record of taking a OT this early and don't see that changing......for the say the redskins..moving up to take a QB Like Sanchez would be a viable option...and we could get back a mid round pick in the deal....

    As far as needing a running back ..we do....JJ is not going to just come alive next year...he has proven to me even before we signed him that he is not the man for the job....Mo Mo should get snagged up by another team leaving us with a need...
    Idahawk, Jan 27, 2009
    #11
    • Moderator

    Hawk096 Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1991
    Member Since:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Location:
    Syracuse, New York
    Walter Jones was a top 10 pick... Ida don't know how early you mean, but he was 7th overall in 1997.
    Hawk096, Jan 27, 2009
    #12
    • Super Moderator

    Seattlehawk94 Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1986
    Member Since:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    250
    Location:
    Throne Room in my Death Star.

    Julia Joan is probably the only RB that would make me pine for Shauna Alexandria... :lol:
    Seattlehawk94, Jan 27, 2009
    #13

  15. vanillathrilla

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that what Julie need is carries. I think he was upset about having to split carries with Mo because of promises Holmgren made to Mo. Look at JJ's stats in the games where Mo was out hurt, he was a monster. I think he felt he should have earned that role then, and kind of gave up when he saw that mike was going with Mo regardless. I am one of those people that feels the position is overrated anyway, and that with a good line, a decent back will perform like a star. Case in Point, Shawna. Best line in football in 05, and an NFL MVP season for a back that was quite frankly a pussy.
    vanillathrilla, Jan 27, 2009
    #14

  16. vanillathrilla

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I also enjoy watching Duckett Smash ahead at low speed for almost a guaranteed two.
    vanillathrilla, Jan 27, 2009
    #15

  17. vanillathrilla

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yards I mean
    vanillathrilla, Jan 27, 2009
    #16
    • Super Moderator

    bobflipaburger Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1989
    Member Since:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    4,210
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Roy ,WA
    I think Duckett should get more carries
    bobflipaburger, Jan 27, 2009
    #17
    • Super Moderator

    Seattlehawk94 Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1986
    Member Since:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    250
    Location:
    Throne Room in my Death Star.
    :lol:

    True that....
    Seattlehawk94, Jan 27, 2009
    #18

  20. SeahawkWag

    Member Since:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Location:
    Everett WA
    We have no track record of taking a OT this early and don't see that changing......

    WTF?
    ??? How many times have we had this high of a pick and needed a OT!!!!??????
    OK how many top 5 WR have done anything in the last 10 yrs. Yet everyone wants a guy that is bigger than anything we have but is not fast and has a history of dropping balls in close games.
    SeahawkWag, Jan 27, 2009
    #19
    • Super Moderator

    Seattlehawk94 Super Moderator

    Seahawks Fan Since:
    1986
    Member Since:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    250
    Location:
    Throne Room in my Death Star.

    Let's see...Since 1998 (10 years) there have been 5 WRs drafted in the Top-5...Here is the list..Yeah, there are so many busts on that list...You've got 2 Future HOFers in Fitz and AJ and one who's career should take off now that he's in Dallas...

    Meanwhile the two busts are from the Leos and the Bungholes...Yeah, like they draft well anyways...

    Calvin Johnson, who is good in spite of playing for the Leos...
    Uh....Larry Fitzgerald who I'm sure you can't dispute..
    Andre Johnson...


    Peter Warrick...Bust
    Charles Rogers....Bust...

    Crabtree is the highest rated WR to come out since Fitz and he's probably the best player in the draft..And yet some of you FOOLS want a LT? :roll:

    The window is fucking closing and some of you want to slam the door early? Unfuckingreal.....
    Seattlehawk94, Jan 28, 2009
    #20
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page