 |
Do you like this thread? Tell your friends:
| | 
01-30-2009, 09:00 PM
|  | Pro Bowler | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,810
| |  Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
I think the Rams need to realize their team is shit and start firing people and try to pick up some free agent talent. Bulger is getting older and really has lost the talent he once possessed. They need a guy to help them prepare for next year or the year after, but knowing the rams, they will probably try to pick the top rated guy who is available for their pick.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-30-2009, 09:22 PM
| | Undrafted Free Agent | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 261
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by Idahawk |
| |
Originally Posted by vanillathrilla | |
OL not an option? Dude you are obviously are suffering head trauma. I'm Done with you.
|
Ive got head trauma ???? We have like 12 OL and you want to spend our first pick on another one... 
"I'm Done with you. " I want my ring back then ...Beoocth
| So in your eyes all OL are equal huh? That is why I think you are retarded. We have ONE good OL player, and he is old and uncertain. |
01-30-2009, 09:26 PM
| | Undrafted Free Agent | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 261
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by phaZe |
The Rams have other issues they need to address. If all they needed was WR they wouldn't have another top 5 pick. I could see them doing that just because they know the Seahawks will probably take him if they don't and you don't want the rival getting a guy you know will be hard to cover.
But, until the Combine, it's hard to say if Crabtree is worth that pick anyways.
| I think I remember hearing that Crabtree isn't going to run in the combine. It can really only hurt his stock if he does. |
01-30-2009, 11:26 PM
| | Cheerleader | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 38
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by Seattlehawk94 |
You're claiming Issac Bruce wasn't "established" as a #1 WR before 1999?
Uh...He had a 119 Catch season in 1995 for 1,781 (second all-time EVER) and another 80+Catch 1,000+ yard season in 1996. His "awful" 1998 season was due to the fact he only played in 5 games due to injury and his '97 season he was within 200 yards of another 1,000 yard season and he only played in 12 games.
"Established"? Shit, he did that IN SPITE of having Tony Banks and a great list of other hasbeens and neverwillbes. He was the ONLY thing the Lambs had to fear in the mid-90s and the only player on that team most causal fans would recognize...If that isn't established I dunno what is...
| My bad, big oversight there. I was under the impression Issac Bruce was drafted only a year or two before the Rams only checked the Rams stats in '98 and '99. Also, I never said he was "awful" in 1998. Like I said, I was under the impression it was only his first or second year, and that 38 receptions was pretty solid for a receiver that young.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-30-2009, 11:50 PM
| | Pro Bowler | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,810
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by vanillathrilla |
| |
Originally Posted by phaZe |
The Rams have other issues they need to address. If all they needed was WR they wouldn't have another top 5 pick. I could see them doing that just because they know the Seahawks will probably take him if they don't and you don't want the rival getting a guy you know will be hard to cover.
But, until the Combine, it's hard to say if Crabtree is worth that pick anyways.
| I think I remember hearing that Crabtree isn't going to run in the combine. It can really only hurt his stock if he does.
| I thought the Combine was a requirement by the NFL for incoming draftees. If so, I doubt they would let players skip parts of it for no reason. I think not doing the 40 will hurt him just as much if he does do it and gets around a 4.5 time.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-31-2009, 12:32 AM
| | Cheerleader | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 38
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by phaZe |
| |
Originally Posted by vanillathrilla |
| |
Originally Posted by phaZe |
The Rams have other issues they need to address. If all they needed was WR they wouldn't have another top 5 pick. I could see them doing that just because they know the Seahawks will probably take him if they don't and you don't want the rival getting a guy you know will be hard to cover.
But, until the Combine, it's hard to say if Crabtree is worth that pick anyways.
| I think I remember hearing that Crabtree isn't going to run in the combine. It can really only hurt his stock if he does.
| I thought the Combine was a requirement by the NFL for incoming draftees. If so, I doubt they would let players skip parts of it for no reason. I think not doing the 40 will hurt him just as much if he does do it and gets around a 4.5 time.
| Not a requirement at all. You have to be invited to even go, but you don't have to accept that invitation.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-31-2009, 04:51 AM
|  | Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,493
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
Hasselbeck lost his invitation because Ryan Leaf decided to declare for the draft. Ryan who? Yeah, exactly.
__________________
Somewhere out there is a man. He's not the 11th Man and he isn't the 13th... |
01-31-2009, 05:00 AM
|  | Divisional MVP | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Throne Room in my Death Star.
Posts: 1,968
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
You can't argue that Leaf is one of the greatest COLLEGE QB EVER...
Then again, the Fab Five and Michael Black as well as that great Flab Five OL did have alot to do with it...
Actually, now that I think about it....That 1997 Cougs offense might have been one of the best in CFB history no matter who was the QB for that team.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
2010=Matthew's Revenge!! |
01-31-2009, 10:07 AM
|  | Positions Assistant | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Roy ,WA
Posts: 2,545
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by Seattlehawk94 |
You can't argue that Leaf is one of the greatest COLLEGE QB EVER...
Then again, the Fab Five and Michael Black as well as that great Flab Five OL did have alot to do with it...
Actually, now that I think about it....That 1997 Cougs offense might have been one of the best in CFB history no matter who was the QB for that team.
| I don't know... The 2008 squad's offense was pretty elite
__________________
Thanks for the memories JR.!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-31-2009, 11:34 AM
| | 3rd Round Draft Pick | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: A motel with your wife
Posts: 582
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by vanillathrilla |
| |
Originally Posted by Idahawk |
| |
Originally Posted by vanillathrilla | |
OL not an option? Dude you are obviously are suffering head trauma. I'm Done with you.
|
Ive got head trauma ???? We have like 12 OL and you want to spend our first pick on another one...
"I'm Done with you. " I want my ring back then ...Beoocth
| So in your eyes all OL are equal huh? That is why I think you are retarded. We have ONE good OL player, and he is old and uncertain.
|
And in your eyes we have only one OL worthy of being on the field ?...And you have personally evaulated our recent draft picks and the rookies we have and made this educated statement .
I'm sorry I don't believe you have a clue about what the hell you just said...your throwing out every OL we have , all our draft picks, free agents and practice squad players, our whole draft system, scouting and talent evaluation process. And your plan to fix that is to draft a LT with our # 4 pick...GOOD ONE, sounds to me like we need to use all our draft picks on OL....
__________________
I am not an option |
01-31-2009, 12:35 PM
| | Divisional MVP | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Throne Room in my Death Star.
Posts: 1,968
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
Fuck, what is up with you two?
When I'm asking that kinda question, you know it's pretty fucked up...
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
2010=Matthew's Revenge!! |
01-31-2009, 06:24 PM
| | Pro Bowler | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,810
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
Matt was on NFL Network talking to all the guys and when Sanders (Maybe Sapp, I forgot which one asked) mentioned a guy from Texas named Michael Crabtree who could be a threat for Matt, he avoided talking about Crabtree and went right ahead and said the offense will be good once everyone heals.
I don't know if that shows he doesn't want to comment on the guy or he just doesn't want anyone high up on the Seahawks to think he wants Crabtree.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
01-31-2009, 06:45 PM
| | Undrafted Free Agent | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 261
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by Seattlehawk94 |
Fuck, what is up with you two?
When I'm asking that kinda question, you know it's pretty fucked up... | Just having a hard time understanding what kind of moron says OL is not an option, and that we have depth at that position. I don't think Ida has seen the seahawks. |
01-31-2009, 07:17 PM
| | Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,493
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
| |
Originally Posted by Seattlehawk94 | |
You can't argue that Leaf is one of the greatest COLLEGE QB EVER...
| You are right, I cannot argue that. LOL. Although, when I think of that, I also think of Marques Tuiasosopo. The only player in NCAA history to run for 200 yards in a game and throw for 300. And what has he done since? He became a pro at riding the pine in Oakland, of all places...
__________________
Somewhere out there is a man. He's not the 11th Man and he isn't the 13th... |
01-31-2009, 07:26 PM
| | Divisional MVP | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Throne Room in my Death Star.
Posts: 1,968
| | Re: If the Rams take Crabtree then we take ?
Lapsoapsosopo was a damn good QB, but he's not on Leaf's level in terms of career and talent in CFB. He never put up the number Leaf did nor did he really do anything Crystal Chandlier, or Steve Peuler did at U-Dubya, he continued a great program.
Leaf took a program from the ashes and took them to their first Rose Bowl in 67 years. There is no comparison.
In truth, Leaf should've been the next Elway.....Lapso is Jason Gesser with more hype...If Jason went to U-Dubya he'd be on the bench with an NFL team somewhere as well. But since he went to WSU he's "undersized" and was never drafted and basically cut after 1 season as the Tittyann's 3rd String waterboy.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
2010=Matthew's Revenge!! | | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
|
